🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a prohibition on deploying state troops in the Oregon city, after a recent legal decision.

Appeals Court Agrees to Rehear Case

The federal appeals court decided on this week that it would reexamine the case concerning the president’s authority with an larger group of eleven justices. The judicial body also vacated a earlier ruling from a smaller judicial group that had sided with the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the most recent development in a protracted legal battle over whether the administration has the legal right and valid reason to deploy state military units in Portland. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since late September when the deployment effort was initiated in response to months of protests.

Differing Viewpoints

The federal government has claimed that federal officials at the ICE facility in the southern part of the city were facing threats, while local authorities maintain that municipal police have control of the situation.

Contrary to characterizations of Portland as “war ravaged”, locals have been sharing videos of lush hiking trails and a vibrant culinary culture, and planning activities such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the increased military presence.

Recent Legal Actions

The Tuesday ruling came after a federal judge in the city enacted two temporary restraining orders this month – one preventing the federalization of the Oregon national guard, and another stopping the use of any national guard troops in Oregon, after efforts to circumvent the initial injunction by mobilizing troops from California.

On Monday, the ninth circuit panel had put the first ruling on hold – allowing command of 200 Oregon national guard – but the second ruling stayed effective, preventing the physical sending of the forces.

Full Panel Consideration

The Tuesday decision means the matter will be heard “en banc” – with all decisions under review simultaneously – by a panel of 11 judges.

“This decision demonstrates that the truth matters and that the courts are striving to ensure government responsibility. The constitution restricts the president’s power, and local populations cannot be treated as a testing site for unchecked federal authority,” said the legal representative in a statement.

“The court is sending a definite signal: the executive leader cannot send the military into US cities without cause. We will continue defending Oregon’s laws, values, and autonomy as this case moves forward and our legal battle continues in the courts.”